The Legacy of the British Raj in India

The British rule on India & 39; and managed for the best part of 100 years & 39;. They started trade with India & 39; early 1600 & 39; s. Until & 39; in the middle of 1700, he was engaged in the fight against the various kingdoms. Until & 39; in the middle of 1800, it is entirely under the control of the Indian subcontinent and were either directly by the management resources of the Indian public service, or rental of premises, the Maharajahs to manage their own kingdoms, as long as the Maharajahs, the British have paid the fee required, and were willing to follow the provisions and conditions on the British.
In 1947, the British left India l & 39; partitioned into India and Pakistan after more d & 39; one million people died in migration between the two countries. Apart & 39; India was almost bankrupt with very little infrastructure or & 39; l & 39; industry. But if the first went to the & 39; British India in 1600, it was a place rich with great & 39; GDP and a large production unit, c & 39; is the reason why Britons wanted to trade with the first place. The conclusion is that the British left India in the & 39; a worse state then, as they found it.
Since 1947 l & 39; India has developed the & 39; all its basic infrastructure and l & 39; industry, including roads, & 39; agriculture, textiles, steel & 39;, & 39; nuclear energy, space, military, telecommunications and IT, and more. He also much progress, which some consider that it & 39; is a global super-power potential in the very near future, and that everything happens within 60 years after the cessation of India.
So British what was really the heritage of the British in India? Many would say that the British were in a rich country, filled with dry, then left. D & 39; other would say, British culture (on the training of nations), technology and, of course, the major English language in a country which & 39; has never lived elsewhere this.
But all have a point which is often forgotten, that & 39; India is now a united country with a democracy and all institutions for the maintenance of democracy, justice and armed forces. The British had a big hand in this even if their motivations were different. In principle, when the British arrived in India in 1600 & 39; s, c & 39; was a country fragmented into several small kingdoms which & 39; not well between them. The British took advantage of these differences and scope of each gobbled slowly thereafter, the sum of all these kingdoms under British rule. At some point, if the British left presented a united India.
It seems that & 39; No agreement was reached by a foreign power, as the British, because the kingdoms is that insofar as they would be the British against the & 39;, but they did not join the other & 39; against the British. The Indian sign error in the person is exactly what the British and is also the reason why it would be very difficult for the Indians, united, even without external influence.
India some great strides in the last 60 years, because & 39; he met. Of course, it must be regarded as an important British legacy.
Increase sales, business cards, brochures,



Bookmark it: